Page 342 - Gear Technology Solutions
P. 342

24.3  Original Vector Feed

                   The first vector feed concept was developed by Gleason in 1989 to establish
                   the same cutting conditions during the plunge as they existed in mechanical
                   cradle style machines. The tilted cutter in a cradle style machine favors the in-
                   side blade during the plunge in face hobbing, as shown in Figure 2. Favors
                   means here the inside blade has a higher chip load. However, for face milling
                   the cutter tilt has the opposite direction, which means that the outside blade
                   has a higher chip load. At the time of this vector feed development, the subjec-
                   tive assessment of the machine operators confirmed that the cutting process
                   performance was now very similar to the traditional mechanical machines.


















                             Figure 2: Original vector feed, derived from a tilted cutter in a
                                                   cradle style machine

                                                           ®
                   After the introduction of PowerCutting  (high speed dry cutting) and after gaining
                   more experience with the dynamics of free-form Phoenix machines, several addi-
                   tional vector feed concepts have been developed. Today, the vector feed angles
                   are automatically calculated by the summary software. There are differences in
                   face hobbing and face milling as well as differences between a pinion roughing
                   plunge and a Formate gear completing plunge. The feed calculation in Phoenix
                   cutting machines which establishes the feed path from the index position to the full
                   depth position works in a reverse direction from the final position at full depth back
                   out to the index position. This way, independent from the feed vector angles, the
                   final position at full depth is consistent with the calculated basic settings. It has to
                   be considered that certain extreme vector directions might cut areas away which
                   present a stock-off condition versus the final flank surface. These areas would not


                                                                                                     327
   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347