Page 412 - Gear Technology Solutions
P. 412

1.  In case of a forced master (or virtual a master in the second run) the pro-
                          gram writes in “13” all basic settings and cutter definitions and archives
                          in step “16” each consolidated JOBj under the new name JOBjC.

                       2.  In case the virtual master is chosen (and first run) the program continues
                          at “12” in a subroutine “14” which is devoted to creating the ideal virtual
                          master.

                   For the inventive virtual master, cutter radius and blade dedendums are based
                   on the pinion and gear geometry with the smallest root slot width at the toe.
                   Cutter radius and blade dedendums are now modified using the precise radius
                   values  at  the  individual  blade  reference  points  used  in  equation  (4).  At  this
                   point the precise deeper cutting amounts are calculated, and the blade point
                   radii and blade dedendums are defined. The balance between deeper cutting
                   and shallower cutting is calculated from the user input. If the user enters 20%
                   of  shallow  cutting  is  allowed,  the  procedure  arranges  the  range  of  jobs  be-
                   tween 20% shallower cutting and 80% deeper cutting. The pressure angle of
                   each  blade  kind  (pinion  inside  and  outside  blade,  gear  inside  and  outside
                   blade) are calculated as an average of all individual blade kinds (e.g. the virtu-
                   al pinion master inside blade pressure angle is the average of all pinion inside
                   blades pressure angles).

                   After  the  virtual  master  has  been  defined  in  “15”,  the  consolidation  process
                   continues  at  “7”  where  the  process  repeats  steps  “8”,  “9”,  “10”,  and  “11”.  In
                   contrast to the first run, now all calculations are performed with the virtual mas-
                   ter,  leading  to  a  significant  improvement  of  the  consolidation  success.  The
                   tests with the inventive consolidation method have shown that many job varie-
                   ties which were not possible to successfully consolidate in the past can now be
                   consolidated without sacrifice of the physical properties of the individual jobs.
                   The process passes now through “12” to “13” and “16” concludes the consoli-
                   dation task.


                   29.6  Consolidation Job Analysis Output

                   The consolidation output for the pinion jobs is shown in Figure 8. The ten pos-
                   sible consolidation jobs are shown next to each other. The lines below summa-
                   rize the items in Figure 8 in table form:

                                 - Tooth counts
                                 - Hypoid offsets and deviation from average
                                 - Cutting methods
                                 - Cutter head types
                                 - Pinion spiral angles and deviation from average


                                                                                                     397
   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417