Page 220 - Gear Technology Solutions
P. 220

16       Psychoacoustic Flank Form Modulations with MicroForm





                   16.1  Background

                   The science of psychoacoustics is the study of sound perception. Sound pattern
                   optimization has become very popular in the resent years. Brecher et al. [1, 2, 3, 4]
                   show in their research papers how they apply psychoacoustics to the noise emit-
                   ted by gears. Brecher applies from tooth to tooth individually different flank form
                   changes to reduce the tonality. Tonality is used as a psychoacoustic measure, in
                   order to judge how gear noise is received by the human ear and evaluated by the
                   brain. Gear noise might be perceived as non-disturbing or not noticeable; even if a
                   sound pressure measurement or a single flank test indicates that the gearset is
                   loud and disturbing according to traditional rules.

                   Topography scattering, as proposed by Brecher, addresses spiral angle and pres-
                   sure angle changes on the flank surfaces of the gears to be optimized. The spiral
                   angle and pressure angle changes have different amounts from tooth to tooth. In
                   the examples [1, 2, 3 and 4], random distributions as well as normal distributions
                   have been applied in order to quantify the changing spiral angle and pressure an-
                   gle amounts from tooth to tooth.


                   16.2  The Function of the Ear

                   The physics of sound transmission is based on the compression and expan-
                   sion of solid materials as well as fluids. The mathematical function of the com-
                   pression and expansion of elastic materials is most likely always a sinusoidal
                   function.  The  assumption  that  all  sounds  which  are  transmitted  and  emitted
                   consist solely of sinusoidal elements seems reasonable.

                   The concert pitch A of 440 Hz from a tuning fork, sounds to the human ear dif-
                   ferent  than  from  a  violin  or  from  a  piano.  The  reasons  are  overtones  which
                   consist of  higher harmonics,  side bands and/or  other  elements in  the sound
                   waves which might not be captured by the FFT. However, the fact that the 440
                   Hz can be recognized precisely by a listener is explained with the higher har-
                   monics accompanying the fundamental frequency [5].

                   The assumption that the ear tends to recognize only harmonic signals is par-
                   tially correct. The outer ear acts as an equalizer and compressor which boosts
                   the sound pressure by 15 to 20 dB. The airwaves actuate the eardrum which in
                   turn actuates the ossicles which act as equalizer, compressor and impedance



                                                                                                     205
   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225