Page 368 - Gear Technology Solutions
P. 368

aborts  after  maximally  6  steps).  The  dampening  factor  and  the  number  of
                   steps  has been  adjusted  such  that the overall  system of loops works  stable
                   and the final result in all evaluated cases are within the acceptable accuracy
                   limits (see Figure 15).




















                                     Figure 15: Regaining of correct blade spacing

                   Figure  16  is  the  blade  grinding  summary  output  section  with  the  effective
                   blade  geometry.  The  yellow  highlighted  line  items  show  the  effective  cutting
                   edge hook  angle  of  1.00° and the effective cutting  side  rake  angle of  4.50°.
                   Those  are  exactly  identical  with  the  input  values  of  the  TREFACE  program
                   where  the  correct  values  have  been  achieved  with  one  single  run  of
                   TREFACE. The blade spacing was kept precisely at the value of the reference
                   cutter.

                   In the output in Figure 16 the blade spacing correction is evident in the fact
                   that the effective tip clean up thickness of the outside blade varies by a large
                   amount from the target value (2.47mm versus 1.00mm).

                   Face milling designs do not require the outer iteration loop in Figure 14, be-
                   cause the tooth thickness is independent from the blade spacing.










                                                                                                     353
   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373