Page 39 - Gear Technology Solutions
P. 39

Whereas:
                   a…  Pressure Angle at Flank-Root Transition
                   M…  Bending Moment
                   W…  Section Modulus
                   b…  Face Width
                   h…  Tooth Root Thickness
                   l…     Force Application arm = Module
                   F…  Force
                   s…  Root Bending Stress Calculated as Cantilever Deflection Beam

                   For  example,  the  formal  relationship  in  equations  1  through  8  applied  to  a
                   straight  bevel  gear  with  a  straight  root  which  has  a  module  of  5mm,  a  face
                   width of 30 mm and a root tooth thickness at the center of 7.5mm shows that
                   for a force of 12500N the root bending stress is equal:

                                 s  = 12500 • 5 / (30 * 7.5²/6) = 222.21 N/mm²                        (6)

                   For a comparable Coniflex bevel gear with a root which is DR = 1mm deeper at
                   the  center  and  0mm  deeper  at  the  ends  the  following  assumptions  can  be
                   made:

                   Average value of deeper root over entire face = 60% of value at center (1mm•
                   0.6=0.6mm). Pressure angle at the stress critical 30° tangent is 30°. The re-
                   sulting root bending stress is equal:

                        s Coniflex  = 12500 • (5+0.6) / (30 * [7.5+2*0.6*sin30°] ²/6) = 213.38 N/mm²  (7)

                   The comparison example in equations (6) and (7) show that the effect of taller
                   tooth at midface and larger root tooth thickness at midface cancel each other
                   out such that the Coniflex straight bevel gear shows even some reduction of
                   calculated root stress compared to the straight bevel gear with a straight root.

                   The limits of this principle are given by the fact that in case of a too large cur-
                   vature of the root line, the hourglass shaped root width will cause the cutter to
                   mutilate  the  opposite  flank.  The  output  of  the  Gleason  Straight  Bevel  Gear
                   software gives a warning in cases where this is critical. The rule is that the re-
                   lation between face width and cutter radius should be below 40% in order to
                   achieve optimal root geometry.

                                 Face Width / Cutter Radius < 0.26 (ideal) 0.4 (limit)                (8)

                   40%  of  the  radius  of  a  cutter  with  9”  diameter  is  (4.5”  or  114.3mm)  •  0.4  =
                   45.7mm, which leads in case of a recommended face width of 33% of the out-
                   er cone distance  to  a  maximal ring gear  diameter  of  about  275mm.  This  di-
                                                              ®
                                                                                ®
                   mension is close to the limit of Phoenix 275 or Phoenix 280 machines, where
                   the maximal Coniflex cutter diameter is equal 9” “which closes the circle” [2].


                   24
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44