Page 16 - Gear Technology Solutions
P. 16

1        Dimension Sheet Explanation Update




                   1.1  What Items have been Added?

                   Several  output  items  have  been  added  to  the  Special  Methods  Dimension-
                   Sheet  in GEMS.  Some  of  those items  are  known  from the traditional CAGE
                   Dimension-Sheet [1], others have been added in order to account for straight
                   bevel and face gears as well as for super reduction hypoid gears (SRH). In this
                   manual the new output items are explained and illustrated.

                   1.2  Tooth Thickness Convention for Straight Bevel Gears

                   Of  particular  interest  for  manufacturers  of  straight  bevels  gears  is  the  tooth
                   thickness convention and definition. Many straight bevel and spiral bevel gear
                   manufacturers lean in their strength calculations and documentations towards
                   ISO, AGMA, DIN and other national standards. All of those standards have in
                   common to define the tooth thickness at the pitch point in the normal direction.
                   Presently  it  is  common  for  bevel  and  hypoid  gears  to  calculate  the  tooth
                   thickness as the relationship between the angular location of the convex and
                   the concave flanks. This relationship is transferred with the CMM download file
                   to the metrology device. After the measurement of one or more teeth (or slots)
                   the  average  difference  between  the  flank  locations  according  to  the  tooth
                   thickness angle is shown as “Tooth Thickness Error” in linear dimension. That
                   means, the tooth thickness is expressed as an arc around the rotational axis of
                   the gear and the tooth thickness error is a linear dimension along the same
                   arc.  Although  this  convention  works  extremely  well  for  tooth  thickness
                   corrections,  it  does  not  reveal  the  normal  chordal  tooth  thickness  and  the
                   normal  chordal  tooth  thickness  error.  In  addition,  the  tooth  thickness
                   measuring  points  generally  do  not  match  the  pitch  line  and  are  not  exactly
                   located at the mean face positions as defined by the standards. The reason for
                   this  is  that  the  CMM  grid  center  point  is  per  definition  the  tooth  thickness
                   reference  point.  Depending  on  the  applied  edge  reductions,  the  grid  center
                   point will not match the flank center and its relation to the pitch point cannot
                   easily  be  revealed  due  to  the  curved  lead  of  spiral  bevel  gear  teeth.  A
                   universal solution for this problem has been developed in the GEMS flank form
                   and  CMM  grid  generator  in  connection  with  an  evaluation  applet  in  the
                   Dimension-Sheet software.









                                                                                                        1
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21